越智 萌｜Megumi Ochi
刑事法から世界を見る｜Watching the World through Criminal Law
関連判例 Relevant Jurisprudence
様々な国際刑事判例をトピックごとに整理し、アクセスしやすくしていきます。国際刑事手続関連から始めます。
This page provides index by topic and quick links to eack international criminal jurisprudence. It starts from issues related to international criminal proceedings.
一事不再理
ne bis in idem
ICCs
ECCC
イエン・サリに対する人民革命法廷による前訴の取扱い
Prosecutor v. Nuon Chea et al, Provisional Detention Order (C22) Co-Investigating Judges (14 November 2007).
Prosecutor v. Nuon Chea et al, Pre-Trial Chamber Decision on Appeal against Provisional Detention Order of Ieng Sary (C22/I/74) Pre-Trial Chamber (17 October 2008).
Prosecutor v. Nuon Chea et al, Closing Order (D427) Co-Investigating Judges (15 September 2010).
Prosecutor v. Nuon Chea et al, Pre-Trial Chamber Decision on Ieng Sary”s Appeal against the Closing Order (D427/1/30) Pre-Trial Chamber (11 April 2011).
Prosecutor v. Nuon Chea et al, Decision on Ieng Sary”s Rule 89 Preliminary Objections (Ne Bis In Idem and Amnesty and Pardon), (002/19-09-2007/ECCC/TC E51/15) Trial Chamber (3 November 2011).
ICC
Prosecutor v. Chui, Decision on the evidence and information provided by the Prosecution for the issuance of a warrant of arrest for Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui (ICC-01/04-02/07-3) Pre-Trial Chamber I (6 July 2007).
Prosecutor v. Chui, Initial Appearance (ICC-01/04-01/07-T-33) Pre-Trial Chamber I (11 February 2008).
Prosecutor v. Katanga and Chui, Judgment on the Appeal of Mr. Germain Katanga against the Oral Decision of Trial Chamber II of 12 June 2009 on the Admissibility of the Case (ICC-01/04-01/07-1497) Appeals Chamber (25 September 2009).
ICTY
ドイツ国内での先行手続が捜査段階であった場合
Prosecutor v. Duško Tadić, Decision on the Defence Motion on the Principle of Non-Bis-In-Idem (IT-94-1-T) Trila Chamber (14 November 1995).
ICTR
並行捜査の結果の一事不再理効の範囲
Prosecuor v. Bagosora, Decision on the Application by the Prosecutor for a Formal Request for Deferral (ICTR-96-7-D) Trial Chamber I (17 May 1996).
HRCs
ECHR
一事不再理効の範囲
Franz Fischer v. Austria, Application No. 37950/97 (29 May 2001).
Gradinger v. Austria, Application No. 15963/90 (23 October 1995).
Oliveira v. Switzerland, Application No. 84/1997/868/1080 (30 July 1998).
Zolotukhin v. Russia, Application No. 14939/03 (10 February 2009).
国境を超える一事不再理の保護の否定
Gestra v. Italy, Application No. 21072/92 (16 January 1995).
継続犯の場合
Rohlena v. the Czech Republic [GC] - 59552/08
Judgment 27.1.2015 [GC]
IntACHR
Carpio-Nicolle et al. v. Guatemala, Judgement (Merits, Reparations and Costs), Series C No. 117 (22 November 2004).
HRC
A. P. v. Italy, Communication No. 204/1986, U.N. Doc. A/43/40 (1988).
A. P. v. Italy, Communication No. 204/1986, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/2 (1990)
domestic cts
USA
Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932).
Heath v. Alabama, 474 U. S. 82 (1985).
Illinois v. Allen, 397 U.S. 337 (1970).
Lewis v. United States, 523 U.S. 155 (1998).
Moore v. People, 55 U.S. 13 (1852).
UK
Connelly v DPP [1964] AC 1254.
Germany
BGHSt 43, 96 ff., Urteil vom 15.05.1997 (1 StR 233/96) - DRsp Nr. 1997/8865.
BverfGE 45, 434 - Beschluß vom 07.09.1977 (2 BvR 674/77) - DRsp Nr. 1994/2729.
BverfGE 75, 1 - Beschluß vom 31.03.1987 (2 BvM 2/86) - DRsp Nr. 1996/6435.
France
Ch. Réunies 25 novembre 1841, Certier, S. 1841, 1.
欠席裁判
in absentia trial
在廷とは、被告人の物理的（physical）な在廷を指す
ICTR
Prosecutor v. Zigiranyirazo, Decision on Interlocutory Appeal (ICTR-2001-73-AR73) Appeals Chamber (30 October 2006).
Prosecutor v. Hategekimana, Judgment (ICTR-00-55B-A) Appeals Chamber (8 May 2012).
被告人によるボイコット
ICTY
Prosecutor v. Blaskić, Judgment on the Request of the Republic of Croatia for Review of the Decision of Trial Chamber II of 18 July 1997 (IT-95-14-AR108bis) Appeals Chamber (29 October 1997).
ICTR
Prosecutor v. Nahimana et al., Judgment (ICTR-99-52-A) Appeals Chamber (28 November 2007).
「実質的な裁判の妨害」
ICTY, Prosecutor v. Šešelj, Decision on Assignment of Counsel (IT-03-67-PT) Trial Chamber I (21 August 2006)
ICTR
Prosecutor v. Zigiranyirazo, Decision on Interlocutory Appeal (ICTR-2001-73-AR73) Appeals Chamber (30 October 2006).
その他
HRC
Mbenge v. Zaire, Communication No. 16/1977 (25 March 1983).
Maleki v. Italy, Communication No. 699/2996 (27 July 1999).
ECHR
Colozza v. Italy, Application No. 9024/80 (12 February 1985).
Demebukov v. Bulgaria, Application No. 68020/01 (28 February 2008).
other international courts
STL
Prosecutor v. Ayyash et al., Order to Seize the Trial Chamber Pursuant to Rule 105 bis (A) of teh Rules of Procedure and Evidence in Order to Determine Whether to Initiate Proceedings in Absentia(STL-11-01/I/TC) Pre-Trial Judge (17 October 2011).
Prosecutor v. Ayyash et al., Decision to Hold Trial in Absentia (STL-11-01/I/TC) Trial Chamber (1 February 2012).
domestic
USA
Crosby v. United States, 506 U.S. 255 (1993).
受理許容性
admissibility
ICCs
ICC
「同一行為、同一人物」基準
Prosecutor v. Lubanga, Decision concerning Pre-Trial I’s Decision of 10 February 2006 and the Incorporation of Documents into the Record of the Case against Mr Thomas Lubanga Dyilo (ICC-01/04-01/06-8-Corr) Pre-Trial Chamber I (24 February 2006).
「実質的」「同一行為、同一人物」基準
Prosecutor v. Muthaura, Kenyatta and Ali (ICC-01/09-02/11-274) Appeals Chamber (30 August 2011)
Prosecutor v. Gaddafi and Al-Senussi, Decision on the Admissibility of the Case against Abdullah Al-Senussi (ICC-01/11-01/11-466-Red) Pre-Trial Chamber I (11 October 2013).
国家の訴追する意思・能力
Prosecutor v. Gaddafi and Al-Senussi, Decision on the admissibility of the case against Saif Al-Islam Gaddafi (ICC-01/11-01/11-344-Red) Pre-Trial Chamber I (31 May 2013).
国内刑事訴訟体系の考慮
Prosecutor v. Simone Gbagbo, Decision on Côte d’Ivoire’s challenge to the admissibility of the case against Simone Gbagbo (ICC-02/11-01/12-47-Red) Pre-Trial Chamber I (11 December 2014).
事件の重大性
gravity of a case
ICC
Prosecutor v. Abu Garda, Decision on the Confirmation of Charges (ICC-02/05-02/09-243-Red) Pre-Trial Chamber I (8 February 2010).
Prosecutor v. Al Bashir, Judgment on the appeal of the Prosecuto against the “decision on the Prosecutor’s Application for a Warrant of Arrest against Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir” (ICC-02/05-01/09-73), Appeals Chamber (3 February 2010).
Prosecutor v. Banda & Jerbo, Decision on the Confirmation of Charges (ICC-02/05-03/09-121-Corr-Red), Pre-Trial Chamber I (7 March 2011).
Prosecutor v. Katanga & Chui, Motion Challenging the Admissibility of the Case by the Defence of Germain Katanga, pursuant to Article 19(2)(a) of the Statute (ICC-01/04-01/07-949) Trial Chamber II (11 March 2009).
Prosecutor v. Katanga & Chui, Reasons for the Oral Decision on the Motion Challenging the Admissibility of the Case (Article 19 of the Statute) (ICC-01/04-01/07-1213-tENG), Trial Chamber II (16 June 2009).
Prosecutor v. Lubanga, Decision on sentence pursuant to Article 76 of the Statute (ICC-01/04-01/06-2901), Trial Chamber I (10 July 2012).
Prosecutor v. Lubanga, Decision on the Prosecutor’s Application for a warrant of arrest, Article 58 (ICC-01/04-01/06-8-Corr), Pre-Trial Chamber I (10 February 2006).
Prosecutor v. Mbarushimana, Decision on the confirmation of charges (ICC-01/04-01/10-465-Red), Pre-Trial Chamber I (16 December 2011).
Prosecutor v. Muthaura, Kenyatta & Ali, Decision on the Confirmation of Charges Pursuant to Article 61(7)(a) and (b) of the Rome Statute (ICC-01/09-02/11-382-Red), Pre-Trial Chamber II (23 January 2012).
Prosecutor v. Muthaura, Kenyatta & Ali, Defence Challenge to Jurisdiction, Admissibility and Prosecutor’s Failure to Meet the Requirement of Article 54 (ICC-01/09-02/11-338), Pre-Trial Chamber II (19 September 2011).
Situation in Darfur, the Sudan, Prosecutor’s Application under Article 58(7) (ICC-02/05-56), Pre-Trial Chamber I, 27 February 2007.
Situation in the Central African Republic, Decision Requesting Information on the Status of the Preliminary Examination of the Situation in the Central African Republic (ICC-01/05-6), Pre-Trial Chamber III (30 November 2006).
Situation in the Central African Republic, Prosecutor’s Report Pursuant to Pre-Trial Chamber III’s 30 November 2006 Decision Requesting Information on the Status of the Preliminary Examination of the Situation in the Central African Republic (ICC-01/05-7), Pre-Trial Chamber III (15 December 2006).
Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Judgment on the Prosecutor’s appeal against the decision of Pre-Trial Chamber I entitled “Decision on the Prosecutor’s Application for Warrant of Arrest, Article 58” (ICC-01/04-169), Appeals Chamber (13 July 2006).
Situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Prosecution’s Application under Article 58 (ICC-01/04-01/10-11-Red2), Pre-Trial Chamber I (20 August 2010).
Situation in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Prosecutor’s Application Pursuant to Article 58 as to Muammar Mohammed Abu Minyar Gaddafi, Saif Al-Islam Gaddafi and Abdullah Al-Senussi (ICC-01/11-4-Red), Pre-Trial Chamber I (16 May 2011).
Situation in The Republic of Cóte d'Ivoire, Decision Pursuant to Article 15 of the Rome Statute on the Authorisation of an Investigation into the Situation in the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire (ICC-02/11-14), Pre-Trial Chamber III (3 October 2011).
Situation in the Republic of Côte d'Ivoire, Request for authorization of an investigation pursuant to article 58 (ICC-02/11-3), Pre-Trial Chamber III (23 June 2011).
Situation in the Republic of Kenya, Decision Pursuant to Article 15 of the Rome Statute on the Authorization of an Investigation into the Situation in the Republic of Kenya (ICC-01/09-19), Pre-Trial Chamber II (31 March 2010).
Situation in the Republic of Kenya, Prosecutor’s Application Pursuant to Article 58 as to Francis Kirimi Muthaura, Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta and Mohammed Hussein Ali (ICC-01/09-02/11-35-Red2), Pre-Trial Chamber II (15 December 2010).
Situation in the Republic of Kenya, Prosecutor’s Application Pursuant to Article 58 as to William Samoei Ruto, Henry Kiprono Kosgey and Joshua Arap Sang (ICC-01/09-30-Red2), Pre-Trial Chamber II (15 December 2010).
Situation in the Republic of Kenya, Request for authorisation of an investigation pursuant to Article 15 (ICC-01/09-3), Pre-Trial Chamber II (26 November 2009).
Situation in Uganda, Decision on the Prosecutor’s Application for Warrant of Arrest under Article 58 (ICC-02/04-01/05-1), Pre-Trial Chamber II (8 July 2005).
恩赦
Amnesties
普遍的管轄権が設定されている犯罪に対する恩赦の国際刑事司法機関での取扱い
SCSL
Prosecutor v. Morris Kallon and Brima Buzzy Kamara, Decision on Challenge to Jurisdiction: Lomé Accord Amnesty (SCSL-2004-15-AR72(E)) and (SCSL-2004-16-AR72(E)) Appeals Chamber (13 March 2004).
国王令による恩赦の国際刑事司法機関での取扱い
ECCC
Prosecutor v. Nuon Chea et al, Provisional Detention Order (C22) Co-Investigating Judges (14 November 2007).
Prosecutor v. Nuon Chea et al, Pre-Trial Chamber Decision on Appeal against Provisional Detention Order of Ieng Sary (C22/I/74) Pre-Trial Chamber (17 October 2008).
Prosecutor v. Nuon Chea et al, Closing Order (D427) Co-Investigating Judges (15 September 2010).
Prosecutor v. Nuon Chea et al, Pre-Trial Chamber Decision on Ieng Sary”s Appeal against the Closing Order (D427/1/30) Pre-Trial Chamber (11 April 2011).
Prosecutor v. Nuon Chea et al, Decision on Ieng Sary”s Rule 89 Preliminary Objections (Ne Bis In Idem and Amnesty and Pardon), (002/19-09-2007/ECCC/TC E51/15) Trial Chamber (3 November 2011).
救済に対する権利の保障のために、国家が捜査及び訴追を行う義務
HRC
Larrosa v. Uruguay, Communication No. 88/1981 (25 March 1983).
ECHR
Aksoy v. Turkey, Application No. 21987/93 (18 December 1996).
IntACHR
Velásquez Rodríguez v. Honduras, Series C No. 4 (29 July 1988).
恩赦法が、国際法における重大な人権侵害を捜査し処罰する国家の義務に反するか
IntACHR
Gomes Lund et al. v. Brazil, Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations, and Costs, Series C No. 219 (24 November 2010).
Almonacid Arellano et al. v. Chile, Judgement (Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs), Series C No. 154 (26 September 2006).
ACHPR
Mouvement Ivoirien des Droits Humains (MIDH) v Côte d’Ivoire, Communication No. 246/2002 (29 July 2008).
時効の禁止
ECHR
Abdülsamet Yaman v. Turkey, Application No. 32446/96 (2 November 2004),
ACHPR
Malawi African Association and Others v. Mauritania, Communication. Nos. 54/91, 61/91, 98/93, 164/97 to 196/97 and 210/98 (11 May 2000).
IntACHR
Barrios Altos v Perú, Series C No. 75 (14 March 2001).
恩赦法により中止された前訴の一事不再理効
ECHR
Marguš v. Croatia [GC] - 4455/10 Judgment 27.5.2014 [GC]